Trainer and Assessor Evaluation Tool Step 1 of 4 25% TRAINER AND ASSESSOR EVALUATION TOOL VERIFICATION OF COMPETENCE (VOC) Aligned to the Standards for RTOs 2025Trainer / Assessor / Staff Member Name(Required) First Last Date of Evaluation(Required) DD slash MM slash YYYY Area of Employment(Required)Transport & Logistics (TLI)Health (HLT)Property Services (CPP)VOCConstruction and Building (CPC)Resource Industry (RII)Health and Safety (OHS)Training and Education (TAE)OtherIf Other(Required)Position Held with ITS(Required) Trainer/Assessor Trainer Only Assessor Only Trainer and/or Assessor Under Supervision Employment Status with ITS(Required) Casual / Sessional Full-time Part-time Contractor - I invoice I.T.S Type of Evaluation(Required) Annual Probation Targeted Follow-up Location of Employment(Required) Victoria Interstate Cohort Taught(Required)Mobile Number(Required)Email Address(Required) Training Product/s Delivered(Required) UOC - Units of Competence Qualifications VOC Non-Accredited Courses Rating Scale4 – Exceeds expectations 3 – Meets expectations 2 – Partially meets expectations 1 – Does not meet expectationsTraining Delivery PerformanceSession well planned and structured(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsDelivery paced appropriately(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsOutcomes and expectations explained clearly(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsTraining activities engage learners(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsResources accurate and current(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsTrainer demonstrates strong subject knowledge(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsIndustry examples and contextualisation used(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsLearners encouraged to participate(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsTrainer checks learner understanding(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsFeedback to learners is clear and constructive(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsDelivery adapts to learner needs and LLN requirements(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsSafe and inclusive learning environment maintained(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsAssessment Practice ReviewAssessment requirements explained clearly(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsAssessment conditions appropriate(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsApproved assessment tools used correctly(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsAssessment decisions evidence‑based(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsJudgements align with marking guide/benchmark(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsFeedback supports learner improvement(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsAssessment records complete and accurate(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsReassessment managed fairly and consistently(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsIntegrity of assessment maintained(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsLearner Support and ProfessionalismTrainer approachable and supportive(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsLearners aware of support options(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsSupport needs identified and addressed(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsRespectful and inclusive behaviour demonstrated(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsCompliance, Credentials and Role SuitabilityAppropriate training and assessment credential held(Required) YES NO Evidence / CommentsCredential authenticated and on file(Required) YES NO Evidence / CommentsIf working under direction, arrangements documented(Required) YES NO N/A Evidence / CommentsTrainer does not perform tasks beyond credential scope(Required) YES - Goes above and beyond BUT within an acceptable parameter YES - Trainer exceeds there authority NO N/A - Does not apply to the subject taught Evidence / CommentsVocational competency relevant to training product(Required) YES NO Evidence / CommentsCurrent industry skills and knowledge demonstrated(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsTrainer matrix/profile current and accurate(Required) YES NO Not Assessed Evidence / CommentsParticipation encouraged for all learners(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsBehaviour managed professionally(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsAppropriate referral to support services when needed(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsIndustry Currency and Professional DevelopmentParticipates in relevant professional development(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsPD includes VET practice / assessment capability(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsPD includes learner engagement and support capability(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsIndustry engagement relevant to delivery scope(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsTrainer demonstrates awareness of current industry practice(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsIndustry currency evidence recent and meaningful(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsTrainer reflects on performance and improvement areas(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsDocumentation and Continuous ImprovementRecords submitted accurately and on time(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsFollows RTO policies and procedures(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsParticipates in validation and moderation activities(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsRaises risks or issues appropriately(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsContributes to resource or tool improvement(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsResponds constructively to feedback(Required) 4 - Exceeds expectations 3 - Meets expectations 2 - Partially meets expectations 1 - Does not meet expectations Evidence / CommentsI confirm that I have participated in a Trainer and Assessor Evaluation conducted by Intelligent Training Solutions as part of the organisation’s quality assurance, compliance, and continuous improvement processes. I understand that this evaluation forms part of the Registered Training Organisation’s responsibilities to ensure that trainers and assessors meet the Trainer and Assessor requirements under the Standards for Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) 2025, including maintaining: appropriate training and assessment capability relevant vocational competency current industry skills and knowledge ongoing professional development I acknowledge that: The evaluation reviewed my performance in relation to training delivery, assessment practices, learner support, industry currency, and professional capability. I have had the opportunity to discuss the outcomes of this evaluation and receive feedback regarding my performance and professional practice. Any areas for improvement identified during the evaluation have been explained to me, and I understand that these may form part of my professional development plan or capability development schedule for the next 12 months. I agree to participate in relevant professional development activities, mentoring, or improvement actions identified by the RTO to support continuous improvement and maintain compliance with the Standards for RTOs 2025. I understand that this evaluation forms part of the RTO’s ongoing monitoring of trainer and assessor performance, which supports the organisation’s compliance, training quality, and student outcomes. Acknowledgement of Feedback I confirm that I have received feedback regarding this evaluation and understand any identified strengths, improvement opportunities, and required actions.Consent(Required) I have read the staff (trainer/assessor) declaration list aboveTrainer / Assessor Signature Supervisor / Manager Name Dr.MissMr.Mrs.Ms.Mx.Prof.Rev. Prefix First Last Supervisor / Manager Email Supervisor / Manager Signature
